Smith and Merrick Garland of the Department of Justice lack constitutional authority to prosecute Trump – PERIOD!!

Are Trump’s Lawyers Deliberately Throwing the Case?

As an expert in Economics and a keen observer of legal matters, it is alarming to witness the unfolding events surrounding the prosecution of former President Trump. The recent proceedings have raised serious concerns about the constitutional implications and the potential long-term repercussions.

One key aspect that has come to light is the lack of challenge to the appointment of a special counsel in this case. Justice Thomas, along with Justice Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, have all expressed reservations about the precedent being set by allowing an unelected and unsupervised prosecutor to bring charges against a sitting president. This raises significant questions about the separation of powers and the due process rights of the accused.

Related:  18 Republicans in Arizona indicted by Democrats for falsely claiming Trump won the 2020 election

As the conversation continues around immunity and subject matter jurisdiction, it is essential to remember the core principles laid out in the Constitution. Article I, Section 6, Clause 1, prohibits the arrest of a Congressman or Senator to interfere in their vote, and Article II, Section 4, clearly outlines the process for charging and trying the President. These foundational principles must be upheld to protect the integrity of the legal system.

Furthermore, the actions of Merrick Garland and Jack Smith in this case raise serious concerns about potential treasonous conduct. The Constitution specifically defines treason as levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies. If their actions are found to align with these definitions, it would be a grave violation of their oaths and could have severe consequences.

Related:  Fed Chair Powell laments lack of progress on inflation this year

In conclusion, the current legal battle surrounding the prosecution of former President Trump is not just about one individual. It is about upholding the principles of the Constitution, ensuring due process, and preventing the erosion of the rule of law. The decisions made in this case will have far-reaching implications and set a precedent for future administrations. It is crucial that we remain vigilant and uphold the values that our Founding Fathers envisioned for a just and fair legal system.

Source link