FDA Approves Ivermectin and Revises COVID-Era Messaging

Title: The FDA’s Misinformation on Ivermectin: A Landmark Case of Government Overreach

In a shocking turn of events, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been forced to remove all social media posts and consumer directives denying the effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. This comes after a group of doctors filed a lawsuit against the FDA for blocking this proven treatment, which may have led to countless preventable deaths.

We all remember the FDA and mainstream media dismissing holistic methods and the use of ivermectin as treatments for the coronavirus. Social media platforms were pressured to remove any posts related to ivermectin, commentators were silenced, and the FDA launched a campaign to dispel what they now admit was true all along. The FDA even went as far as posting a picture of a horse online, mocking those who believed in the benefits of ivermectin.

Related:  Market Talk - September 20, 2022

Despite the FDA’s efforts to discredit ivermectin, 101 separate studies have shown it to be an effective treatment for COVID-19, with some sources suggesting a 62% chance of reducing symptoms if taken early. The FDA approved ivermectin for human consumption back in 1996, yet they continued to vilify it as a veterinarian medication throughout the pandemic.

Dr. Mary Bowden, along with Drs. Paul E. Marik and Robert L. Apter, took a stand against the FDA’s misinformation and filed a lawsuit against the agency. Dr. Bowden, who was forced to resign during the pandemic for speaking out against mRNA vaccines and advocating for alternative treatments, treated hundreds of patients successfully with ivermectin.

Related:  Paxlovid & Tollovid Overtake Ivermectin & Open Door for Long-COVID Sufferers

The FDA’s deception has had far-reaching consequences, leading to unnecessary deaths and loss of livelihoods. Simply removing social media posts denying the effectiveness of ivermectin does not seem like a sufficient sentence for the harm caused. It is a landmark case of government overreach that highlights the dangers of trusting in official narratives without questioning their validity.

Source link

Leave a Comment