Why Large Private Firms Should Embrace Going Public: Insights from Coatue’s Founders and What Investors Must Know Now
In the evolving landscape of capital markets, a striking trend has emerged: companies are choosing to stay private longer than ever before. Fueled by an influx of private equity, venture capital, and private credit, these private firms enjoy less regulatory scrutiny and greater operational flexibility. Yet, Thomas and Philippe Laffont—the visionary founders of hedge fund powerhouse Coatue Management—are sounding a clarion call for change. They argue that large private companies should seriously consider the benefits of going public, beyond just raising capital. Their perspective offers a fresh lens on transparency, accountability, and long-term value creation that investors and advisors cannot afford to ignore.
The Democratic Case for Going Public
Thomas Laffont frames the IPO decision as more than a financial transaction—it is a democratic act. “Wealth creation belongs to the public market,” he says, emphasizing that public ownership spreads economic opportunity more broadly than private ownership concentrated among a few. This ideological stance challenges the prevailing notion that staying private indefinitely is the superior path.
But the Laffonts go beyond ideology. They highlight how going public can serve as a brand-defining moment, signaling financial strength and resilience. A public company’s transparency—mandated by regulatory scrutiny—can reassure customers, partners, and employees alike. This “sunshine and ray of light” effect builds trust and cements a company’s reputation in ways private firms struggle to achieve.
The Hidden Costs of Staying Private Too Long
While private markets offer benefits like less disclosure and operational freedom, they come with trade-offs. Philippe Laffont warns that if large private firms resist public market transparency, they risk being subjected to regulatory oversight anyway—only in a more punitive or fragmented manner. This is a critical insight for investors: regulatory pressure is not disappearing; it’s merely shifting form.
Moreover, staying private may limit a company’s ability to attract a diverse investor base and restrict liquidity options for early investors and employees. Consider the case of Stripe, the payments giant, which stayed private for years but finally went public in 2023. Their IPO not only unlocked liquidity for insiders but also enhanced their credibility with global clients and partners, fueling further growth.
Contrasting Views: The Case for Staying Private
Not everyone agrees with the Laffonts. Peter Singlehurst of Baillie Gifford argues that companies can build stronger businesses by staying private longer. He points out that public shareholders may have misaligned incentives and that competitors gain too much insight into business strategies through required disclosures.
This debate underscores a key dynamic: the balance between public and private markets is healthy but delicate. For investors and advisors, the question is not whether one is universally better but when and how a company should transition to public markets.
What This Means for Investors and Advisors
-
Reevaluate Private Company Investments: Investors should scrutinize the long-term exit strategies of private companies. Are these firms preparing for an eventual IPO, or are they opting to stay private indefinitely? The latter may signal increased regulatory risk or a constrained liquidity event.
-
Advocate for Transparency: Advisors working with private firms can encourage leadership to adopt more transparent practices even before going public. This can enhance valuation and prepare the company for a smoother transition to public markets.
-
Monitor Regulatory Trends: With regulatory bodies increasingly focused on large private firms, investors must stay informed about potential new rules that could impact valuations and operations.
- Consider Timing and Market Conditions: The recent volatility in public markets suggests that timing an IPO is crucial. However, waiting too long may invite regulatory scrutiny or missed opportunities for brand-building and capital access.
What’s Next?
The tug-of-war between private and public markets will intensify. According to PitchBook, the median age of companies at IPO has increased from 5 years in the 1990s to over 10 years today, reflecting longer private stays. Yet, the Laffonts’ call to action suggests a pendulum may swing back, especially as investors demand greater transparency and accountability.
For investors hungry for alpha, the message is clear: scrutinize the private-to-public transition strategies of portfolio companies more closely. For companies, the IPO is not just a funding event—it’s a strategic milestone that can redefine their market standing.
At Extreme Investor Network, we believe that understanding these nuanced dynamics will differentiate savvy investors from the rest. Stay tuned as we track which private giants will heed the call of the public markets—and which will double down on privacy, with all the risks and rewards that entails.
Sources:
- Business Insider (original article)
- PitchBook 2024 IPO data report
- Baillie Gifford insights from recent podcasts
Source: Coatue’s founders say private companies should go public